Antenna Gain vs Height


Dielectric  Conductivity  Ground
 Constant       mS/m       Type
    81        5000        Salt water
    80           1        Fresh water
    20          30        Pastoral, low hills, rich soil (Dallas TX to Lincoln NE)
    13           5        Pastoral, medium hills and forestation, heavy clay soil (central VA)
    10           2        Sandy, dry, flat, coastal
     5           1        Cities, industrial areas
     3           0.55     Desert (Idaho)

These graphs show forward gain for horizontal, vertical, and tilted orientation of a halfwave dipole for center heights between 3 and 50 feet. These are NEC results using the Sommerfeld-Norton ground model for a 98-MHz circularly polarized signal arriving at a 1 elevation angle. The gain reference is a circularly polarized isotropic antenna in free space. The difference between the solid and dotted green curves is F/B for the tilted dipole.

Apply the curves to any antenna by adding its gain in dBd to the Y axis. The model is for flat ground with a single specular reflection and no obstructions. Only general trends hold for irregular terrain where scattering at multiple points causes complex wave interference. The curves do not apply when local obstructions block the direct path.

Elevating an antenna may be the easiest and cheapest way to increase signal strength. For example, raising a dipole from 15 to 30 feet increases signal strength about 6 dB (5.6 dB if RG-6 feedline must be lengthened). This is similar to the gain a small Yagi would provide over the dipole with both antennas at 15 feet.


February 4, 201488108 MHz